PhotoFiltre is now at ver. 6.40
Wow, it has been awhile since I have worked on this site, as when I took time off it was at version 6.40.
So I need to work on a fresh/up-to-date 'review'/synopsis on this outstanding image editing app soon!
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Contact
Due to my unhappiness with the forced (and intrusive) ads being used by the service that I had been using for my "contact" form, I now will just provide a contact email addy here. It is not a clickable mail link (sorry), so you must manually type it in.
OR - you can use my contact form (opens in a new window).
If the image above does not load for any reason(s), simply type in freewareoutpost@gmail.com_mail (but remove the _mail)
If you are submitting freeware, please include :
Name of proggie
Size of proggie
Version # of proggie
Homepage url
Screenshot url
d/l url
Author's name
Author's contact info (and if/how to be listed)
Which version(s) of Windows it works with
OR - you can use my contact form (opens in a new window).
If the image above does not load for any reason(s), simply type in freewareoutpost@gmail.com_mail (but remove the _mail)
If you are submitting freeware, please include :
Name of proggie
Size of proggie
Version # of proggie
Homepage url
Screenshot url
d/l url
Author's name
Author's contact info (and if/how to be listed)
Which version(s) of Windows it works with
Friday, June 13, 2008
Desktop search.....
This post will soon be 'updated' to reflect the plethora of 'desktop search' apps that are available.
Have you taken the 'desktop search' plunge yet?
Have you taken the 'desktop search' plunge yet?
Thursday, June 12, 2008
FAQs
How do you choose what proggies/applications are listed?
I list only programs I personally use and find useful, and that are true 100% freeware (NO exceptions).
What is the definition of 'freeware' for this site's purposes?
My/The Freeware Outpost's opinion of true freeware is software
that is available for download at no costs and with no spyware or
adware included. And with no expiration/no time restrictions or and no
'demo only' features (or the lack of features).
Can I submit a freeware program for possible listing on Freeware Outpost?
Click here to submit your freeware only suggestions (please - no spyware or adware).
How often is the site updated?
New listings are posted as I find them. This may vary depending on my schooling and work schedules.
When was this site started?
This site first came online in April 2003, though it had been an idea of mine for over a year. Thanks to the support and encouragement of several friends, it finally was born/created/conceived (?)
Do you list spyware or adware?
NO, I do not consider (in my opinion) spyware and adware to be
freeware so I do NOT list them or consider them for listing on this
site.
Where can I ask a question not answered here?
Use my contact form to send your question(s).
What is The Freeware Revolution?
Here is where you can view an informational page regarding this movement.
I list only programs I personally use and find useful, and that are true 100% freeware (NO exceptions).
What is the definition of 'freeware' for this site's purposes?
My/The Freeware Outpost's opinion of true freeware is software
that is available for download at no costs and with no spyware or
adware included. And with no expiration/no time restrictions or and no
'demo only' features (or the lack of features).
Can I submit a freeware program for possible listing on Freeware Outpost?
Click here to submit your freeware only suggestions (please - no spyware or adware).
How often is the site updated?
New listings are posted as I find them. This may vary depending on my schooling and work schedules.
When was this site started?
This site first came online in April 2003, though it had been an idea of mine for over a year. Thanks to the support and encouragement of several friends, it finally was born/created/conceived (?)
Do you list spyware or adware?
NO, I do not consider (in my opinion) spyware and adware to be
freeware so I do NOT list them or consider them for listing on this
site.
Where can I ask a question not answered here?
Use my contact form to send your question(s).
What is The Freeware Revolution?
Here is where you can view an informational page regarding this movement.
Sunday, June 08, 2008
Is it spyware?
Ever wonder if a 'freeware' program may actually be "spyware"?
Use the form below (from the folks at SpywareGuide.com) to see.
Use the form below (from the folks at SpywareGuide.com) to see.
Or if you care to, you may puruse the full listings of spyware as listed at SpywareGuide.com here.
Monday, June 02, 2008
Graphics Freeware
PhotoFiltre (ver 6.31)
Author : Antonio Da Cruz
PhotFiltre just may be THE photo editing proggie of choice for me from here on out. FREEWARE photo editing proggie that is!
It has a vast array of option and functions and comes preloaded with a slew of plug in/filters!
Size : 1.6 Mb - Rating : 5
Homepage - Download
Author : Antonio Da Cruz
PhotFiltre just may be THE photo editing proggie of choice for me from here on out. FREEWARE photo editing proggie that is!
It has a vast array of option and functions and comes preloaded with a slew of plug in/filters!
Size : 1.6 Mb - Rating : 5
Homepage - Download
Irfanview (ver 4.10)
Author : Irfan Skiljan
If you get one graphics freeware program - Irfanview is it. It may appear to be just a graphics viewer (it is notable that Irfaniew was the first Windows graphic viewer WORLDWIDE with Multiple (animated) GIF support. One of the first graphic viewers WORLDWIDE with Multipage TIFF support. The first graphic viewer WORLDWIDE with Multiple ICO support), but it goes far past 'just' that. It is a thumbnail creation tool, can support many plug ins, can view many additional formats (avi, mpg, mp3 among others).
Size : 4.6 Mb - Rating : 5
Homepage - Download
PIXIA (ver. 3.1te)
Author : Isao Maruoka
PIXIA is a very well rounded graphics program. It serves all this site's graphics needs superbly. It has so many features of commercial graphics programs costing hundreds of dollars (ie, working with brushes, layers)
Filesize : 3.6 Mb Rating : 4
Homepage - Download
DeKnop (ver. 4.3.11)
Author : Sam Francke
I want to thank the author of this proggie for submitting it and for providing this very nicely detailed description :
"DeKnop is a graphics editor that is designed to let you create buttons for your web site without requiring any graphic design experience. Besides it's easy to create 3 fold buttons for Neobook projects.
It provides an easy to use step-by-step interface that lets you select
the text, font style, colors, 3D bevel, size, gradients and more. DeKnop also supports projects, allowing you to save your work.
Create you mouse-over buttons.
Easy to translate the user interface in your language.
Help and interface in French, more interface: Spanish, Francais, Dutch,
Hungarian, Polish, Catalan, Chinese, Czech."
Filesize : 950 Kb - Rating : 4
Homepage - Download
Capture (ver. 1)
Author : Bernt Levinsson
The program's title is 'Capture' and it does just that - screen captures. It saves the 'grabs' as bitmaps (no need to sweat the size of bmp.s , just fire up Irfanview and convert it to another format, my choice is gif). It can do window captures, screen captures or selected areas. You can also do time delayed captures.
Filesize : 248 Kb - Rating : 4
Homepage - Download
Color Cop (ver. 5.3)
Author : Jay Prall
If you work with web pages or graphics, a 'color picker' is a very necessary tool. ColorMania is by far the best and easiest to use I have run across.
Filesize : 326 Kb - Rating : 4
Homepage - Download (download is from C|Net site)
The 'selling' of freeware
Note : This piece was originally written back in 2003, but it is still as relevant as it was back then.
I am actually beginning to 'enjoy' part of the 'freeware' world (note, I said 'some parts of the freeware world'). For I am so delighted that the Freeware Revolution is now beginning to gather momentum and to reach many via some open mined media journalists. This is contrary to the previous maligning goings ons about it that were occurring(and for all I know still do go on). I also am really pleasantly suprised at the numerous kind exchanges I have had via membership at FreewareArena, which it is free, with no strings attached, and no pressures to 'do anythings' (like the typical 'tell everyone about us', click on this link, or visit these sites because we "approve" of them), for people have sent me very nice messages and that is not the typical result of 'joining' a site, usually the site operator is either 'pushy' (as previosuly addressed) or the 'webmaster' simply wants anyone and everyone to be a 'member' to either A ) brag about members numbers, B ) lourde over their 'members' like they are their 'minions' to do their bidding (sorry that is just a line I have always treasured from "Creative Writing" class a few years back), but it does illustrate what many nefarious 'webmasters' do - they impose their greedy goals by pushing the 'promote me' issue, sometimes very discreetly (albiet subtle) or just plain 'hammer to the head' boasting of how their site is so..."blah blah whatever, bling bling of this or that...and soon we will be on top", and other pathetic diatribes to encite visitors to act as promotional tools. I feel sympathy for sites that have to play the 'fame game' and play dirty to 'succeed'. They spend so much time talking trash** that they only end up appealing to the same type of users that they are (**lowest common denominator theory).
The more opportunistic 'webmasters' there are, the narrower the lines of useful knowledge become. Search engines are already overwrought with poor 'results' when searches are done. And the number of 'keyword games players' grows. I am in total agreement that content trumps flash anyday. But intelligence is insulted when this 'knowing how to properly use keywords' is the petty excuse put into play.
Then there are those sites that will proudly link to anyone. Anyone? Hmmm...anyone, could that signify either an urgency to get traffic or simply that they have no regard for visitors as they have no standards. I myself (though new to the 'webmastery' realm) am very selective and though that may ire many, I don't use my site as a soapbox to scream 'look at me'. I have communicated with a small number of very reliable and professional 'webmasters' whose sites are useful and certainly are usable from my youngest cousin to my Grandma. I was raised to be respectful of others and the Internet has the potential to reach untold numbers, so should someone new to my site visit and I send them to a site that I myself would not revisit or am appalled at, what message am I sending to 'guests' to this site? That people are only numbers? NO, I prefer to do things honestly, professionally and straight as an arrow. I only seek to share resources and sites that I find helpful or useful.
Now if I were so inclined to make money, I could follow the trend of 'selling' freeware on disks. But how can doing that convey to people what freeware truly is? If you visit a site that sells freeware, stop, and click to another site, or resign yourself to having been indoctrinated into believeing freeware and shareware are synonymous. And abandon the respect that freeware authors deserve for you have just enabled a plagarist to take a 'gift' and turn it into a 'product'. Also acknowledge that by frequenting/supporting these 'payware' sites, you are condoning and validating these bandits lack of creativity. For they haven't the intelligence to create an original idea, and must ripoff talented people.
Perhaps the answer is one that may trouble some but 'could' alleviate such thievery from getting recognition - censoring on the part of search engines. But with a different approach - have 2 Nets, one for free content(s) and one for 'pay for' contents(s). YES that is a far fetched idea, and no doubt would have 'free speech radicals' warbling about freedom of speech, but when something is blatantly stolen it is a crime, plain and simple. And users deserve the truth, not just 'come ons' of the best 'free software', and then to be led to questionable sites, or lurid content(s). Nor to be duped into 'buying freeware'.
But maybe it relates to how the words aesthetic and pathetic sound so similar any yet are so diametrically different, one deals with beauty (or the conveyance thereof) and one is the almost putridness that results from wallowing in depravity and smirking at what one can wreak.
Sincerely,
Lis
I am actually beginning to 'enjoy' part of the 'freeware' world (note, I said 'some parts of the freeware world'). For I am so delighted that the Freeware Revolution is now beginning to gather momentum and to reach many via some open mined media journalists. This is contrary to the previous maligning goings ons about it that were occurring(and for all I know still do go on). I also am really pleasantly suprised at the numerous kind exchanges I have had via membership at FreewareArena, which it is free, with no strings attached, and no pressures to 'do anythings' (like the typical 'tell everyone about us', click on this link, or visit these sites because we "approve" of them), for people have sent me very nice messages and that is not the typical result of 'joining' a site, usually the site operator is either 'pushy' (as previosuly addressed) or the 'webmaster' simply wants anyone and everyone to be a 'member' to either A ) brag about members numbers, B ) lourde over their 'members' like they are their 'minions' to do their bidding (sorry that is just a line I have always treasured from "Creative Writing" class a few years back), but it does illustrate what many nefarious 'webmasters' do - they impose their greedy goals by pushing the 'promote me' issue, sometimes very discreetly (albiet subtle) or just plain 'hammer to the head' boasting of how their site is so..."blah blah whatever, bling bling of this or that...and soon we will be on top", and other pathetic diatribes to encite visitors to act as promotional tools. I feel sympathy for sites that have to play the 'fame game' and play dirty to 'succeed'. They spend so much time talking trash** that they only end up appealing to the same type of users that they are (**lowest common denominator theory).
The more opportunistic 'webmasters' there are, the narrower the lines of useful knowledge become. Search engines are already overwrought with poor 'results' when searches are done. And the number of 'keyword games players' grows. I am in total agreement that content trumps flash anyday. But intelligence is insulted when this 'knowing how to properly use keywords' is the petty excuse put into play.
Then there are those sites that will proudly link to anyone. Anyone? Hmmm...anyone, could that signify either an urgency to get traffic or simply that they have no regard for visitors as they have no standards. I myself (though new to the 'webmastery' realm) am very selective and though that may ire many, I don't use my site as a soapbox to scream 'look at me'. I have communicated with a small number of very reliable and professional 'webmasters' whose sites are useful and certainly are usable from my youngest cousin to my Grandma. I was raised to be respectful of others and the Internet has the potential to reach untold numbers, so should someone new to my site visit and I send them to a site that I myself would not revisit or am appalled at, what message am I sending to 'guests' to this site? That people are only numbers? NO, I prefer to do things honestly, professionally and straight as an arrow. I only seek to share resources and sites that I find helpful or useful.
Now if I were so inclined to make money, I could follow the trend of 'selling' freeware on disks. But how can doing that convey to people what freeware truly is? If you visit a site that sells freeware, stop, and click to another site, or resign yourself to having been indoctrinated into believeing freeware and shareware are synonymous. And abandon the respect that freeware authors deserve for you have just enabled a plagarist to take a 'gift' and turn it into a 'product'. Also acknowledge that by frequenting/supporting these 'payware' sites, you are condoning and validating these bandits lack of creativity. For they haven't the intelligence to create an original idea, and must ripoff talented people.
Perhaps the answer is one that may trouble some but 'could' alleviate such thievery from getting recognition - censoring on the part of search engines. But with a different approach - have 2 Nets, one for free content(s) and one for 'pay for' contents(s). YES that is a far fetched idea, and no doubt would have 'free speech radicals' warbling about freedom of speech, but when something is blatantly stolen it is a crime, plain and simple. And users deserve the truth, not just 'come ons' of the best 'free software', and then to be led to questionable sites, or lurid content(s). Nor to be duped into 'buying freeware'.
But maybe it relates to how the words aesthetic and pathetic sound so similar any yet are so diametrically different, one deals with beauty (or the conveyance thereof) and one is the almost putridness that results from wallowing in depravity and smirking at what one can wreak.
Sincerely,
Lis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
